Legal Opinion
Meitzner v. Corte
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided July 15, 1976No. Patent Appeal No. 76-554PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Interferences1 (board) awarding priority to the senior party Corte et al.2 over the junior party Meitzner et al.3 on all twelve counts in interference. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The Counts
Counts 6 through 9 and 12 are directed generally to cation exchange resin compositions and counts 1 through 5,10, and 11 are directed to processes for preparing such resins. The resins comprise a water-insoluble matrix having bonded thereto cation exchange groups including, for instance, sulfonic acid…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ceramco, Inc. v. Lee PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Heard v. BurtonUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Silvestri v. GrantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Langer v. KaufmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Edward Fredkin v. Eugene H. IrasekCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Hitzeman v. RutterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- In Re Bruce Charles Farrenkopf and Magdalena Usategui-Gomez, and Travenol Laboratories, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Ronald A. Hitzeman, Arthur D. Levinson, and Daniel G. Yansura v. William J. Rutter, Pablo D.T. Valenzuela, Benjamin D. Hall and Gustav Ammerer, Ronald A. Hitzeman, Arthur D. Levinson, and Daniel G. Yansura v. William J. Rutter, Pablo D.T. Valenzuela, Benjamin D. Hall and Gustav AmmererCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001