Legal Opinion

Stenger v. Holmes

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 1, 1939No. 4095PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal, in an interference proceeding, from a decision of tbe Board of Appeals of tbe United States Patent Office affirming that of tbe Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention of tbe subject matter defined in tbe counts to Morris P. Holmes, tbe senior party.

Tbe interference involves two applications of tbe party Holmes, Serial No. 649,003, for mining machines, filed December 27, 1932, and Serial No. 658,804, for cutter chains, filed February 27, 1933 and an application of Stenger and Bruestle, Serial No. 675,897, for mining machinery cutting bit and mounting…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas A. Kirkham and Norman W. Rosenberg v. Thomas Victor Arden and Gilbert William MerrimanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Jennings v. HillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API