Legal Opinion

Right-Price Recreation, L.L.C. v. Connells Prairie Community Council

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 20, 2001No. 25713-1-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C.J.

Two citizens’ groups opposed a developer’s proposal before Pierce County’s hearing examiner and county council. The developer, alleging that the groups had made false statements about the proposal, sued for damages for slander, commercial disparagement, tortious interference, and civil conspiracy. When the developer sought discovery of all documents related to the citizens’ groups, the groups claimed an associational privilege under the First Amendment. The developer moved to compel production, and the trial court ordered production for in camera review. In this discretionary review of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Talley v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. The Black Panther Party v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. Pollard v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Right-Price Recreation, L.L.C. v. Connells Prairie Community CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Right-Price Recreation v. Connells PrairieWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  4. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API