Legal Opinion
In Re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 26, 2010No. MDL No. 1840. No. 07-1840-KHVPublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring putative class action claims for damages and injunctive relief against motor fuel retailers in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, the District of Columbia and Guam. Plaintiffs claim that because defendants sell motor fuel for a specified price per gallon without disclosing or adjusting for…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing, LLC v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Perry v. SchwarzeneggerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- In Re MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE SALES PRACTICES LITIGATIONCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Anderson v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- Marfork Coal Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.