Legal Opinion
Eugster v. City of Spokane
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 27, 2004No. 21654-3-IIIPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
We granted discretionary review to resolve a discovery dispute arising in the River Park Square (RPS) parking garage controversy. On First Amendment grounds, the Spokane Superior Court quashed certain subpoenas duces tecum. The subpoenas were issued by Citizens Realty Company, Lincoln Investment Company of Spokane, River Park Square, L.L.C., and RPS II, L.L.C. (collectively Developer) to third parties C. Paul Sandifur, Jr., Philip Sandifur, Erik Skaggs, Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co., Inc., Summit Property Development, Inc., and Metwest Mortgage Services, Inc. (collectively…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- TS v. Boy Scouts of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Magana v. Hyundai Motor AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Magaña v. Hyundai Motor AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Tamosaitis v. Bechtel National, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.