Legal Opinion
Talley v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 7, 1960No. 154PublishedCited by 456 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The question presented here is whether the provisions of a Los Angeles City ordinance restricting the distribution of handbills “abridge the freedom of speech and of the press secured against state invasion by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.”1 The ordinance, § 28.06 of the Municipal Code of the City of Los Angeles, provides:
“No person shall distribute any hand-bill in any place under any circumstances, which does not have *61printed on the cover, or the face thereof, the name and address of the following:
“(a) The person who printed, wrote, compiled or manufactured the same.
“(b) The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bates v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Jamison v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by456 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
451 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.