Right-Price Recreation, L.L.C. v. Connells Prairie Community Council
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
— Two citizens’ groups sought review of a Court of Appeals decision which held that the trial court’s order compelling production of the groups’ information for in camera review violated their First Amendment privileges. Finding that the Court of Appeals should also have considered the trial court’s refusal to dismiss the case and, further, that the case should have been dismissed on summary judgment, we remand for dismissal and for a determination concerning attorney fees.
Under RAP 2.4(b), the appellate court reviews orders or rulings not designated in the notice for discretionary review if…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Truck Ins. Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Right-Price Recreation v. Connells PrairieWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.