Cook Paint and Varnish Company v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:
At issue in this case is whether an employer violates Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or the “Act”)1 by seeking to compel employees, at an investigatory interview, to respond to questions raised by company counsel relating to a union grievance that has been scheduled for arbitration. The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) held in this case that Cook Paint & Varnish Company (the “company”) violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act by threatening two employees with suspension or discharge if they refused to respond to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Blinderman Construction Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- John H. Fournelle v. National Labor Relations Board, Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, John H. Fournelle, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States Department of Justice v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Jackson v. Teamsters Local Union 922District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.