Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Teamsters Local Union 922
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 12, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-2065PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs are former employees of Giant Food, LLC, who lost their jobs in June 2012. They have filed suit against Giant as well as the two unions that represented them — Warehouse Employees Union Local 922 and Teamsters Local 730 — alleging that the three entities conspired to misrepresent the reasons for their termination and to induce them to sign disadvantageous severance agreements. All three Defendants now separately seek to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. They argue that Plaintiffs’ causes of action are either…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Woytowicz v. George Wash. Univ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- District No. 1, Pacific Coast District, Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. Liberty Maritime CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jackson v. Teamsters Local Union 922District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Parks v. Giant of Md., LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Jackson v. Teamsters Local Union 922Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.