Legal Opinion
Baehmer v. VIKING INSURANCE
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 22, 1992No. 14063-2-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
In this declaratory judgment action A1 P. Baehmer appeals an order of the Pierce County Superior Court granting summary judgment to the Viking Insurance Company. He contends that the trial court erred in holding that a provision in an automobile liability insurance policy issued by Viking, limiting that company's liability to $25,000 for "each person" and $50,000 for "each occurrence", was not ambiguous, and concluding, therefore, that the lower "each person" limit applied to Baehmer's claim. We affirm.
On August 26, 1988, Baehmer was driving his car northbound on "C" Street in Tacoma in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- R. A. Hanson Co. v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Vadheim v. Continental InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kaplan v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Heringlake v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. GardnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Grimstad-HardyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Livingston v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Wash.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.