Legal Opinion

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Grimstad-Hardy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 7, 1993No. 29635-3-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

The appellants, Barbara Grimstad-Hardy and her father, Ronald E. Grimstad, appeal from a summary judgment proceeding in favor of the respondent, Mutual of Enum-claw Insurance Company. Grimstad-Hardy was injured when an uninsured motorist struck the vehicle in which she was a passenger. Grimstad-Hardy asserts that under the underin-sured motorist (UIM) statute, RCW 48.22.030, she may "stack" coverage for the three vehicles insured under her policy. Grimstad-Hardy alternatively argues that the UIM provisions of the policy contain ambiguous language and should be construed to allow stacking.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Tellevik v. Real Property Known as 31641Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Patrick Archer Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Gragg v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Livingston v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Wash.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company v. WeilertDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  5. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. Patrick Archer Const., Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API