Legal Opinion
Livingston v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Wash.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 21, 1995No. 35074-9-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.
Farmers Insurance Company of Washington (Farmers) appeals from summary judgment in favor of its insureds, Karl Livingston and the insured beneficiaries of the estate of Glenna Livingston (Livingstons). Farmers contends its insurance policy, which limits underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage for bodily injury to $100,000 for "each person” and, "subject to the limit for each person’,” to $300,000 for "each accident,” unambiguously limits the coverage for bodily injury to two persons in the same accident to a total of $200,000. We agree, and reverse.
The Livingstons were involved in an accident…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Vadheim v. Continental InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Haney v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BuckallewMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. GardnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. DanaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
- N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., Inc. v. DanaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021