Legal Opinion

De Forrest v. Wright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1852PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Case reserved from Wayne County Court-.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Copeland, J.

It appears from the certificate of the County Judge who tried this cause below, that it was groved on tbe trial that the defendants were grocery merchants, and surviving partners of the firm of Jonathan L. Wright and Brothers, doing business in the city of Detroit, at the time the alleged cause of action accrued; that J. L. Wright, a member of said firm offered a drayman a certain sum per barrel, to baúl a quantity of salt from a ware house in said city to the store occupied by the defendants, to which offer tbe drayman agreed to accede, provided he could induce…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cypress Pond Draining Co. v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. City of Logansport v. DickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API