Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Patel

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1993No. A059765PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, P. J.

The issue in this case is whether a motel employee who is required to live on the motel premises and who, on average, works no more than five hours a day, must be paid for the entire time he spends at the motel or simply the time he provides actual services. We will conclude the employee must be paid only for the time he provides actual services.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

The relevant facts of this case are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows.

Respondent Bhulabhai Patel owns a 25-unit motel in Fortuna known as the Fortuna Motor Lodge. Appellant Gail…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Aguilar v. Association for Retarded CitizensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Keyes Motors, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards EnforcementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Gipe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Hill v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Hudgins v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API