Brewer v. Patel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSON, P. J.
The issue in this case is whether a motel employee who is required to live on the motel premises and who, on average, works no more than five hours a day, must be paid for the entire time he spends at the motel or simply the time he provides actual services. We will conclude the employee must be paid only for the time he provides actual services.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
The relevant facts of this case are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows.
Respondent Bhulabhai Patel owns a 25-unit motel in Fortuna known as the Fortuna Motor Lodge. Appellant Gail…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Aguilar v. Association for Retarded CitizensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Keyes Motors, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards EnforcementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Gipe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Hill v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Hudgins v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.