Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Land Use Regulation Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 7, 2000PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, J.

[¶ 1] The Passamaquoddy Tribe and the Land Use Regulation Commission appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Humphrey, J.) vacating LURC’s approval of the Tribe’s application for the rezoning of a parcel of land in Albany Township. The court concluded that the parcel was not “Indian territory” as defined by 30 M.R.S.A. § 6205 (1996) and therefore concluded, as a matter of law, that a proposed high stakes bingo facility could not be built on that parcel. See 17 M.R.S.A. § 314-A(5) (Supp.1999). We agree with the Superior Court that the Albany land is not yet…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Lopez-Soto v. HawayekCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Concord General Mutual Insurance v. Patrons-Oxford Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Struck v. HackettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fuhrmann v. Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Great Northern Paper, Inc. v. Penobscot NationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Adoption of M.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. Jade Realty Corp. v. Town of EliotSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API