Lopez-Soto v. Hawayek
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a fundamental question concerning the interpretation of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd (1994) (amended 1997). We neither minimize the difficulty of the question nor pretend that the answer is transpi-ciously clear. Upon careful perscrutation, however, we hold that EMTALA subsections (a) and (b) are to be read disjunctively, not conjunctively. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s contrary ruling and reinstate the plaintiffs’ action.
I. BACKGROUND
We rehearse only those facts necessary to add a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Correa v. Hospital San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Ruiz v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Bernie Harry, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lisa Normil, Deceased v. Wayne Marchant, M.D., Ali Bazzi, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Ninigret Development Corp. v. Narragansett Indian Wetuomuck Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Kibbe v. SumskiBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2007
- Plumley v. Southern Container, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.