Legal Opinion

Fuhrmann v. Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 11, 2012PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.

[¶ 1] Jamie Fuhrmann appeals from the entry of a summary judgment in favor of Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc., by the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) and the court’s dismissal of her claims against four individual supervisors, Christian Steppe, John LeMieux, Matthew Auger, and Annette Rodick, for whistleblower discrimination pursuant to the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), *108726 M.R.S. § 833(1)(A) (2011), and the Maine Human Rights Act (MHRA), 5 M.R.S. § 4572(1)(A) (2011). Fuhrmann contends that a summary judgment for Staples was improper because she presented a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Fantini v. Salem State CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Bard v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. Stanley v. Hancock County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Theriault v. Genesis Healthcare LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. Flood v. Bank of America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. Roy v. Correct Care Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  4. Harrison v. Granite Bay Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. Winslow v. Aroostook CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API