Legal Opinion

Concord General Mutual Insurance v. Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 25, 1980PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

On this appeal we are called upon to interpret the meaning of the “other insurance” clause in the standard fire insurance policy, 24-A M.R.S.A. § 3002. 1

The Plaintiff, Concord General Mutual Insurance Company instituted this suit in Superior Court, Androscoggin County, seeking contribution from the Defendant, Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance Company, on a $22,500 fire loss claim which, after a November, 1977, fire destroyed a residence in Lincoln, Maine, Concord General had paid in full. When both parties moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, M.R.Civ.P., the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carriers Insurance Co. v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Sweeney v. DahlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  3. Ballard v. EdgarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  4. Appeal of DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Terry v. St. Regis Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Michaud v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. National Council on Compensation Insurance v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Perry v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API