Legal Opinion

Great Northern Paper, Inc. v. Penobscot Nation

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 1, 2001PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, J.

[¶ 1] This case requires us to decide whether the Maine Freedom of Access Act, 1 M.R.S.A. §§ 401-410 (1989 & Supp. 2000), which is ordinarily applicable to municipalities and other components of state government, is applicable to the Penobscot Nation and the Passamaquoddy Tribe. We conclude that the Act does not apply to the Tribes when they act in their municipal capacities with respect to internal tribal matters. We further conclude that the Act does apply to the Tribes when they interact with other governments or agencies in their municipal capacities.

[¶ 2] The dispute before us began when…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. The Kansas IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. United States v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1866

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Adoption of M.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  2. Penobscot Nation v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  4. Town of Eagle Lake v. Commissioner, Department of EducationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  5. Dow v. Caribou Chamber of Commerce & IndustrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API