Legal Opinion

City of Moorhead v. Town of Flowing

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 27, 1931No. 28,510PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

This proceeding is one to determine between the plaintiff and the defendant the place of settlement of Halvor Olson, a poor person. It -was tried in the district court on appeal from a justice of the peace. L. 1925, p. 487, c. 378, 1 Mason, 1927, § 3161-1 to § 3161-3. The court found that Olson’s settlement was in the defendant town. It appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.

Halvor Olson was born in Norway. He came to this country in '1893. He first went to Redwood county. He had no family. He was a wanderer. He returned to Norway and then was back in this country. He…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Town of Smiley v. Village of St. HilaireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Village of Grove City v. Township of ManannahSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Cassidy v. City of Little FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Application of Seidel for Old Age AssistanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. In Re Settlement of SpanglerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. City of Detroit Lakes v. Village of LitchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Petersburg v. City of JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. In Re Settlement of GadbawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API