Legal Opinion
In Re Application of Seidel for Old Age Assistance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 27, 1939No. 31,954PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 283 N.W. 742. Appeal by the Welfare Board of Hennepin county from a judgment of the district court of that county affirming a decision of the State Board of Control, hereinafter referred to as "state agency," finding one Edward H. Seidel to be a resident of Hennepin county and directing payment to him of old age assistance in accordance with his budgetary needs.
There is no dispute as to the facts upon which the decision is based. In 1912 Seidel moved from Minneapolis to Pelican township in Crow Wing county, where he located on an 85-acre tract of land referred to in the record…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kelsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Yale v. West Middle School DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- State Ex Rel. Timo v. Juvenile CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Town of Smiley v. Village of St. HilaireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Township of Equality v. Township of StarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crossett v. St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HannaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Goodsell v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Board of Christian Service of Lutheran Minnesota Conference v. School Board of Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. PrestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.