Legal Opinion

Town of Smiley v. Village of St. Hilaire

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1931No. 28,435PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, O. J.

The town of Smiley brought this action against the village of St. Hilaire, the town of Sanders, the town of River Falls, and the town of Rocksbury to have determined the settlement of Henry Seeland, a pauper. These municipalities are all in Pennington county, wherein the town system prevails.

For many years immediately prior to February, 1927, Seeland was a resident and voter in the town of Rocksbury, and during the last nine years of that period he lived with his brother-in-law, Bennie Johnson, then a resident of that town. In February, 1927, Johnson removed from said town of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kelsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  2. Yale v. West Middle School DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Connecticut Hospital for the Insane v. Town of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  4. In Re LeslieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Village of Grove City v. Township of ManannahSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Application of County of Beltrami to Determine Settlement of JoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. In Re Application of Seidel for Old Age AssistanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. In Re Settlement of VenteicherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Township of Equality v. Township of StarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. City of Moorhead v. Town of FlowingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API