Legal Opinion

City of Detroit Lakes v. Village of Litchfield

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1937No. 31,263PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

The township of Darwin in Meeker county appeals from a judgment adjudging the settlement of Thomas Eggers, his wife, and minor child, poor persons, to be in said township and that it be charged with the responsibility of furnishing them with the necessary aid, and that plaintiff and the village of Litchfield are exempt therefrom.

The proceeding is brought under 3 Mason Minn. St. 1934 Supp. §§ 3161-1 to 3161-4. The trial was to the court, and findings of fact and conclusions of law were duly filed. Two findings of fact are attacked by the assignments of error, vie).: (a) That the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Town of Smiley v. Village of St. HilaireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. In Re LeslieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. City of Willmar v. County of KandiyohiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Village of Grove City v. Township of ManannahSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. City of Moorhead v. Town of FlowingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Settlement of VenteicherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. County of Mille Lacs v. Town of LeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. City of Litchfield v. TOWNSHIP OF PAYNESVILLESupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API