Cassidy v. City of Little Falls
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
De Angelis, J.:
On the 21st day of December, 1909, the distinction between town poor and county poor theretofore existing in the county of Herkimer was abolished by the board of supervisors pursuant to section 138 of the Poor Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 42; Laws of 1909, chap. .46).
On the 16th day of December, 1913, the board of supervisors of the county of Herkimer passed a resolution reviving and restoring the distinction between town poor and county poor in Herkimer county pursuant to section 138 of the Poor Law, to take effect March 1, 1914.
The defendant, City of Little Falls, is a municipal…
2Cited by1 opinion
- City of Moorhead v. Town of FlowingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931