Legal Opinion

State v. Muzzy

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 24, 1964No. 1983PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShangraw, J.

This case involves our implied consent law, 23

V.S.A. §1188, and related sections of the statutes, in their application to the respondent charged with having operated a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

Section 1188 reads:

“Any person who operates or attempts to operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway in this state is deemed to have given his consent to submit to a chemical test of his blood or such other test as herein provided for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood whenever he is arrested or otherwise taken…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In Re Walker Estate. TreadwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. State v. HeddingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  4. Cutting v. CuttingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  5. Stevens v. WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Severson v. SueppelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. State v. StarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Heer v. Department of Motor VehiclesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Fallis v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API