State v. Hedding
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The respondent was convicted by jury trial of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, a violation of 23 V.S.A. §1183, in the Barre Municipal Court. He has brought the case here upon notice of appeal from the verdict and judgment.
The first witness called by the State was a Dr. Archambault, city physician and police examiner for the city of Barre. His direct testimony was short, and was only to the effect that he offered to give the respondent various tests to determine whether the respondent was under the influence of alcohol, which tests the respondent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StalloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Solomon v. DabrowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- State v. StorrsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- State v. TaceySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- People v. StrattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dutton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- State v. BreanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- State v. MuzzySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- State v. BrissonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- State v. BarilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.