Carlisle v. Parker
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The land was held by the husband and wife as tenants by the entirety. A joint mortgage was given by them and subsequently foreclosed, the mortgage paid and the balance of the proceeds is now deposited in this court.
The first question to be determined is whether the same estate or interest exists in the proceeds of sale as had existed in the real estate .prior to sale; in other words, whether the fund represented by the proceeds of sale has attached to it those peculiar attributes of an estate by entireties which had existed prior to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Beihl v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Bruce v. . NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Johnson v. . LeavittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Hurd v. HughesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
- Fleek v. ZillhaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- TERRY AND COMPANY v. HensenWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re Wall.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Soliman v. Spencer (In Re Spencer)District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- In Re the Real Estate of CochranSuperior Court of Delaware · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.