Legal Opinion

Heidelberger v. Heidelberger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Herman Heidelberger, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 18th day of February, 1921, denying defendant’s motion to vacate the warrant of attachment.

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Kelby at Special Term.

Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam:, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

The following is the opinion delivered at Special Term:

Kelby, J.:

The defendant specially appears to move to vacate the warrant of attachment and the proceedings of the sheriff thereunder; to vacate and set aside the order for service of the summons outside of the State; to vacate and set aside the service under such order; and to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Several grounds for this relief or part thereof…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vreeland v. Pennsylvania Tanning Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. De Graff v. De GraffNew York Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Stretz v. ZolkoskiNew York Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Schnarch v. ShapiroNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Farlee v. FarleeNew York Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kahler v. SearlNew York Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API