Legal Opinion
Sea Ranch Ass'n v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 13, 1975No. C-74-1320 SWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge, and EAST and WILLIAMS District Judges. DAVID W. WILLIAMS, District Judge:
STATEMENT OF FACTS
In November 1972, the Citizens of California passed the Coastal Zone Conservation Act by means of the initiative process. The Act is designed to preserve the “remaining natural and scenic resources of the coastal zone.” California Public Resources Code, Sec. 27001. 1 The Act established a state commission and six regional commissions charged with the preparation of a land use plan for the California coastal zone and the control of further development in the coastal…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The Sea Ranch Association v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Grupe v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Remmenga v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Isthmus Landowners Ass'n v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Ismus Landowners Association, Inc. v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.