Legal Opinion
Isthmus Landowners Ass'n v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1979No. 77-2651PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs-appellants Isthmus Landowners Association and individual property owners (hereinafter referred to as the Association) appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their suit against the State of California, the California Coastal Zone Con*1089servation Commission, and named individuals (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) for damages, a declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief.
In April 1975 the Association applied for a permit to develop a 37 acre site located in Venice, California. The request was denied. In March 1976 the Association filed a new application to develop a 31…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4219, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5827 the San Remo Hotel Thomas Field Robert Field T & R Investment Corp. v. City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation Department of City Planning Board of Permit Appeals San Francisco Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Retail Clerks Union Local 648, Afl-Cio v. Hub Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Almodovar v. ReinerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ismus Landowners Association, Inc. v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- San Remo Hotel v. City of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.