Ismus Landowners Association, Inc. v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
601 F.2d 1087
The ISTHMUS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a general
nonprofit California Corporation; and David Rome,
on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The STATE OF CALIFORNIA; California Coastal Zone
Conservation Commission, an agency of the State of
California, Joseph E. Bodovitz, Individually and as
Executive Director of the California Coastal Zone
Conservation Commission, Ellen Steen Harris, Donald
Peterson, Ruth Andresen, Emmons Blake, Rimmon C. Fay, Melvin
B. Lane, Fred Farr, Jeffrey D. Frautschy, Robert Mendelsohn,
Roger Osenbaugh, Bernard J. Ridder,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 1245 v. Public Service Commission Of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Manney v. CabellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Ganz v. City of BelvedereDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1990
- VH PROPERTY CORP. v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Blumenkron v. Multnomah CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.