Legal Opinion
Grupe v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 1985No. A019818PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Introduction
The California Coastal Commission and the State of California appeal from a judgment for damages and a judgment granting a writ of mandamus ordering the Coastal Commission to remove from a new development permit a condition requiring respondent to offer to dedicate a public access easement along the beach fronting his property. We examine the disputed condition and conclude that it was properly imposed and does not offend applicable constitutional principles. We therefore reverse the judgments accordingly.
Facts
This case concerns the validity of a condition…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ehrlich v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Whaler's Village Club v. Califonia Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Delucchi v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.