Legal Opinion

Sturtevant v. K. Hovden Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1923No. Civ. No. 4399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Appeal from an order dissolving an attachment.

The sole question here involved is whether or no the two causes of action set forth in the complaint, or either of them, is of such a character as to warrant the issuance of an attachment.

The first cause of action is based upon the theory of rescission and rejection, the complaint in substance alleging that plaintiff's assignors purchased from defendant in San Francisco certain canned apricots of specified grades and standards, to 'be shipped to New York. The goods so purchased were fully paid for. Upon arrival at their destination it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. California Packing Corp. v. KatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Eaton v. QueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Allen v. Merchants Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Landry v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API