Legal Opinion
Owen v. Hill
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1887PublishedCited by 27 opinions
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Case, for failure of trustees of school district to require contractor to execute bond required by Act No. 94, Laws of 1883. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
I take a statement of the case from the brief of counsel for defendants. The italics are theirs:
“1. This suit is in trespass on the case, alleging as the sole cause of action that the defendants were, on the third day of September, 1885, trustees of union school district of the city of Saginaw, and as such trustees on that day let a contract to Benson Haskins, by which he was to furnish materials and build a school-house for said school district for the sum of 810,069; that the building was of such a char*44acter that, if belonging to a private person, a lien for labor and materials would attach…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kendall v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Hover v. BarkhoofCommission of Appeals · 1870
- Raynsford v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Strickfaden v. ZipprickIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by27 opinions
- Weinberg v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Plumbing Supply Co. v. Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Avery v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Plummer v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.