Legal Opinion

Wells v. Board of Education

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

On October 18, 1886, tbe' parties to this suit entered into a written contract which, omitting the formal parts, reads as follows:

“ That the said party of the first part agrees to furnish all materials and labor necessary to finish completed the work required in the erection of two two-story brick additions to the brick school-house in the First ward of "West Bay City, Michigan, in accordance with the drawings and specifications thereof drawn by D. P. Clark, and which said drawings and specifications are made a part of this agreement, as much as if written herein.

“It is furthermore agreed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SheldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Owen v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Plummer v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Weinberg v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. C. A. Burton Machinery Co. v. RuthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Smith v. HubbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Stephenson v. Monmouth Min. & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API