Legal Opinion

Levine v. Ribicoff

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 3, 1962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

In this action both plaintiff and defendant have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The action to which the motions are directed is one brought pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g), to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare by which the claimant, who is the plaintiff here, was denied old-age insurance benefits.

Eligibility for old-age insurance benefits is contingent upon a showing that the claimant is “fully insured,”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Lykes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Morgan v. Social Security BoardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Broz v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Frasier v. FinchDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1970
  3. Maryland Department of Employment Security v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Frank Scotto and Joseph F. Mangan, as Trustees of the Local 807 Labor-Management Health Fund v. Brink's, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Hatfield v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API