Legal Opinion

Maryland Department of Employment Security v. Werner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 14, 1963No. [No. 316, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

We must decide in this case whether wages actually paid, or wages earned, within a statutory base period control eligibility ■for unemployment benefits under the Unemployment Insurance Eaw of Maryland.

Code (1957), Art. 95A, Sec. 4, provides that an individual is ■eligible for benefits with respect to any week only if, inter alia, “(e) * * * (1) During his base period he has been paid wages for insured work * * *” of a specified amount, calculated in a certain manner, and “(2) During that calendar quarter of his base period in which his total wages were highest, he has been paid for insured…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Levine v. RibicoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dessauer v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. State, Department of Industrial Relations v. WillardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Employment Security Division of Arkansas v. HubbardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London that Subscribe to Certificate No. B1234HISINC2023, as Subrogee of H.C. Pody Company v. IAG Construction, Inc. and Pennoni Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. PULLIAM v. COMERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API