Legal Opinion

Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1961No. 7194PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Justice.

Petitioner seeks by certiorari to overturn respondent Industrial Commission’s Award for Non-Compensable Claim. In April, 1958, petitioner Mead, suffering from asthma and a pulmonary disease known as emphysema, filed his claim for compensation, which was denied by respondent Commission in November, 1958. Timely protest and petition for rehearing followed, several lengthy hearings were held, and in September, 1960, the Commission presented its Amended Findings and Award for NonCompensable Claim. The Commission found, inter alia, that:

“ * * * 6. The ore dust and odor of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Harrington v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Treadway v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Johnson v. Arizona Highway DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Ford v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API