Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Judge.
Petitioner, Major Mead, seeks, by certiorari, to set aside the Industrial Commission’s “Second Amended . Findings and Award for’ Non-Compensable1 Claim”, dated 31 January, 1963. The facts, so far as they are pertinent to this matter, are as follows:
Petitioner was hired by the respondent, American Smelting and Refining Company in January, 1955. At that time, he was given a physical examination including x-rays which were negative as far as any chest problems were concerned. In January, 1956, he experienced some coughing on the job and was seen by a doctor and returned to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brown Shoe Company v. ReedTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
- English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Reilly v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Trieschock v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- State Compensation Fund v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Jenkins v. Ogletree Farm SupplyMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.