Legal Opinion

Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 2, 1965No. 1 CA-IC 1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Judge.

Petitioner, Major Mead, seeks, by certiorari, to set aside the Industrial Commission’s “Second Amended . Findings and Award for’ Non-Compensable1 Claim”, dated 31 January, 1963. The facts, so far as they are pertinent to this matter, are as follows:

Petitioner was hired by the respondent, American Smelting and Refining Company in January, 1955. At that time, he was given a physical examination including x-rays which were negative as far as any chest problems were concerned. In January, 1956, he experienced some coughing on the job and was seen by a doctor and returned to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Company v. ReedTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  2. English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Reilly v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Trieschock v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. State Compensation Fund v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Jenkins v. Ogletree Farm SupplyMississippi Supreme Court · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API