Legal Opinion

Ford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1985No. 17585-PRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

Claimant is a disabled worker seeking benefits under the Arizona Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), A.R.S. § 23-901 et seq. The Act is constitutionally mandated to provide compensation for employees who suffer injury “from any accident arising out of and in the course of employment.” Ariz. Const, art. 18 § 8. Claimant’s disability is allegedly one which falls within the occupational disease portion of the Act.

The issues presented are, first, whether a claimant whose disability is attributable to a work-related disease must proceed under the special provisions of the Act…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Matter of MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  3. English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Dunlap v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Polanco v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Kaibab Industries v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API