Legal Opinion
State Bar of Michigan v. Woll
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1972No. 1 December Term 1971, Docket No. 53,531PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwainson, J.
On April 15, 1970, an Assistant Grievance Administrator of the State Bar of Michigan filed request for an investigation of attorney Arthur S. Woll. A formal complaint was filed on September 10, 1970, charging Woll with solicitation of workmen compensation cases through the use of touters or “runners,” particularly one David Wood.
Hearing was held before Wayne County Hearing Panel No. 2 on November 3, 1970. Mr. Wood never personally appeared before the hearing panel because of poor health. He testified by deposition and, by stipulation of the parties, his deposition included two statements he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LobaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- State Bar of Michigan v. Doerr (In Re Doerr)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. FreidMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. PoslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.