Legal Opinion

State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Posler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1973No. 6 September Term 1973, Docket No. 54,407PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. G. Kavanagh, J.

The respondent was suspended from the practice of law for 30 days for gross negligence in the handling of a claim in the Common Pleas Court for the City of Detroit.

On appeal he poses one question:

"In a State Bar Grievance Proceeding, does a mere preponderance of the evidence sustain a Hearing Panel’s finding of gross negligence by Respondent in the performance of his professional duties?”

He cites decisions of this Court in State Bar of Michigan v Woll, 387 Mich 154; 194 NW2d 835 (1972); Matter of Hamilton Baluss, 28 Mich 507 (1874); and In re Clink, 117 Mich 619; 76 NW 1 (1898) in support of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Bar of Michigan v. WollMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In re BalussMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. In re ClinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Union National Bank v. Williams Milling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Francis J. Charlton v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. In Re RobsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Paul J. Walwyn v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. McWhorterMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API