Legal Opinion

Crabtree v. Jones

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1993No. 9226SC1134PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCRODDEN, Judge.

The issue underlying the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is whether the restrictive covenant agreement on the subject property is enforceable inter se, i.e., whether one lot owner may enforce it as against another lot owner.

Plaintiff and defendant own houses in the residential development known as Carmel Estates East in Charlotte, North Carolina. The parties’ lots are two of 47 in that subdivision which are subject to a restrictive covenant agreement recorded on 13 March 1962 (the Agreement). The Agreement provides, among other things:

1. All lots shall be used for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Runyon v. PaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Ingle v. StubbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Humphrey v. . BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Lamica v. GerdesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Rosi v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buie v. High Point Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Williams v. PaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Donaldson v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Barfield v. MatosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Carolyn Louise Gunn Testamentary Tr. v. BumgardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API