Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. . Beall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1939PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'WiNBORNE, J.

The refusal of defendants’ motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, here assigned as error, present this basic question: Do the covenants and reservations in the deed for lots sold by the developer negative a general plan or scheme for the development of the area of land in question for residential purposes? We are of opinion that as a matter of law the answer is “Yes.” The exception is well taken. Davis v. Robinson, 189 N. C., 589, 127 S. E., 697.

As a general rule, “the right of grantees from a common grantor to enforce inter se restrictive covenants entered into by each with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Starkey v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Franklin v. Elizabeth Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Higdon v. JaffaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Tull v. Doctors Building, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Sedberry v. ParsonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Starmount Co. v. Greensboro Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API