Legal Opinion

Williams v. Paley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1994No. 932SC411PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendants contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for plaintiff. We disagree and affirm.

I

Initially, we note that an “injunction is a proper equitable remedy to enforce a restrictive covenant when the plaintiffs show that their remedy at law is inadequate and that they will suffer irreparable damage if the violation is allowed to continue.” Barber v. Dixon, 62 N.C. App. 455, 457, 302 S.E.2d 915, 916, disc. review denied, 309 N.C. 191, 305 S.E.2d 732 (1983) (citing Ingle v. Stubbins, 240 N.C. 382, 82 S.E.2d 388 (1954); Franzle v. Waters, 18 N.C. App. 371,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. J. T. Hobby & Son, Inc. v. Family Homes of Wake County, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian ChurchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Medearis v. Trustees of Myers Park Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Dunes South Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. First Flight Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Bermuda Run Country Club, Inc. v. AtwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Dill v. LoiseauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. Dunes South Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. First Flight Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API