Legal Opinion

Goldsby v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1921No. 16265PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered July 15, 1920, dismissing an action in tort, upon setting aside a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries, and for damages to an automobile, claimed to have been caused by negligence chargeable to the defendant. The cause was tried to the court and a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the. plaintiff. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was made and subsequently an alternative motion for a new trial. The trial court granted the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and entered a judgment dismissing the action. Thereafter an order was entered reciting that in the event that there was an appeal, and it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McEvilla v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Johnson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Devitt v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Beeman v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Black v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Plastino v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Dye v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Swanson v. Pacific Northwest Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Hoyer v. Spokane United RailwaysWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Sparling v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API