Legal Opinion

Hoyer v. Spokane United Railways

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1929No. 21820. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Hoyer, seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries alleged as suffered by him from the negligent operation of a street car of the defendant, Spokane United Railways. Trial upon the merits in the superior court for Spokane county, sitting with a jury, proceeded until the conclusion of the evidence introduced in behalf of the plaintiff, when counsel for the defendant, by appropriate motion, challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain any recovery against the defendant, asked that the court so decide as a matter of law, and that judgment of dismissal be entered in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brandt v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Child v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Goldsby v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Nabours v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McClelland v. Pacific Northwest Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hynek v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Thomson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hynek v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API