Sparling v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.
— This is an action for damages for injuries received by reason of a collision between a street car and the automobile of respondents. Fifteenth avenue north, in the city of Seattle, runs north and south and is intersected by East Roy street, running east and west. In the morning of November 16, at about one a. m., the respondents were riding in their automobile along East Roy street, going west towards Fifteenth avenue north. They were returning to their home on Malden avenue, about two blocks from the place of the accident. The asphalt street was wet and slippery.
It is claimed by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Fluhart v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Beeman v. Puget Sound Traction Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Herrett v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Bowden v. Walla Walla Valley Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fisher v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Radford v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Stidell v. DavidsonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Isitt v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Queen v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924