Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. 16131PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior eourt for King county, Ronald, J., entered May 14, 1920, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for injuries sustained in a collision with a street car.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In this action, the respondent Johnson recovered against the appellant, city of Seattle, for injuries to his person and property, which he alleged were caused by the negligent operation of a street car of the appellant.

From the evidence the jury were warranted in finding the following facts:

First avenue is a street of the appellant city extending north and south. It has upon it two parallel street car tracks. These tracks are equidistant from the center of the street, their inner rails being five feet three and one half inches apart. Over these tracks, the city operates street cars; the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burian v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Ziomko v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Coons v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Johannessen v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Carlisle v. HargreavesWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goldsby v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Nabours v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. MacDonald v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Brum v. HammermeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Plastino v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API