Legal Opinion

Barton v. Hooker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 1955No. 35708PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

This case involves the question of whether a savings account in the First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa, a savings account in the Peoples State Bank of Tulsa, Oklahoma, and seven United States Savings Bonds of $1,000 denomination each, all standing in the joint names of Flora B. Barton and Tono L. Hooker are the sole property of Tono L. Hooker, by reason of the death of Flora B. Barton, or whether said accounts and bonds 'are assets of the estate pi Flora B. Barton, deceased.

Plaintiff, Tono L. Hooker, was the nephew of Flora B: Barton, now deceased. He brings this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sinift v. SiniftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Decker v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. United States v. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Conrad v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. In re the Estate of DeyoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Peyton v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. In Re Estate of MacFarlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Melton v. EnsleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Matter of Estate of IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Baker v. BakerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API